researchClimate & Earth ScienceComputer SciencePublic Health

How U.S. Federal Artificial Intelligence (AI) policy is shaping agrifood systems: an integrative review

Cole BaerlocherU.S. House Ways and Means Committee, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, United States.Sarah McCordDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.Elizabeth TabaresDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.Arturo EspañaDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.E. Alex KeaslerDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.Rafael LandaverdeDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Published
17 September 2026
DOI
10.3389/frai.2026.1881767
Views
3
Reads
0
Citations
0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping how agrifood systems function in the United States, yet the role of federal policy in guiding its use, oversight, and broader consequences is still not well defined. This study explores how current U.S. federal AI policies support-or limit-the advancement of agrifood systems by synthesizing evidence from publicly available policy documents. Using a focused search strategy and qualitative content analysis, we reviewed nine federal policy documents released through September 2025 to identify key priorities and overlooked areas relevant to agriculture. Our analysis revealed six recurring themes: environment, precision agriculture, workforce development, governance, technological infrastructure, and partnership. The findings show that federal AI policy places considerable emphasis on building infrastructure, strengthening workforce capacity, and establishing governance frameworks. At the same time, less attention is given to environmental trade-offs, equitable access for small- and mid-scale producers, and the place specific conditions that shape agricultural practice. Notably, tensions emerge between policies that promote rapid expansion of AI infrastructure and those aimed at protecting environmental resources and strengthening climate resilience. Taken together, the results suggest that although agriculture is increasingly recognized within the national AI agenda, the lack of a coordinated, agriculture specific policy framework may lead to uneven adoption and unintended outcomes across the agrifood system. This study offers a synthesized policy foundation to support future research, inform decision making, and engage stakeholders in aligning AI innovation with more sustainable and equitable agrifood systems.

Continue reading this article

The abstract is always free. The full text, figures and PDF are available with a one-off purchase or an all-access subscription.

This article
$15.00

One payment, permanent access

  • Full text and figures
  • Permanent access, read any time
  • Saved to your library
All access
$29.00/month

Every article, every field

  • Unlimited reading
  • All subject areas
  • Cancel any time
See subscription

Related research